Apple - Post-WWDC: Siri AI Looks Like the Future. Its Rollout Looks Like A Big Problem.
Apple finally showed a Siri AI demo worthy of the name. But with beta timing, hardware caveats, no China or EU launch and little revenue visibility, WWDC did not ship the AAPL valuation case. It pushed it into the autumn.
Apple finally showed something that looks genuinely agentic and useful. I liked the Apple Intelligence and SiriAI (cringe name but still). That’s all good. But there Are a lot of buts.
One of the largest is, that if you’re not on an iPhone 17 Pro or Air, you don’t get the full version.
Two years after telling people to upgrade to the iPhone 16 to get “Apple Intelligence” and that it would run on all Macs and iPads with an M-Series in it Apple have half kept their promise. And Siri is use limited, unless you have an iCloud+ account.
Except .. unless your device has 12GB of RAM then you don’t get all the bells and whistles, because for all the fawning and flocking of the tech fetish press to praise Apple for “doing it right, in the end,” sadly Apple has done what it does to so many early adopters: bugger them over.
Because the Siri and AI shown at WWDC will not work on an iPhone 16 Pro Max. In fact it won’t even work on a base iPhone 17. It needs 12GB of RAM because Apple has found it isn’t that exceptional after all, and can’t cram their model into 8GB.
So now “Apple Intelligence” comes in three tiers: None, Some, and All. No exceptions. No refunds. No apology. Oh, and Siri is use-limited, unless you have an iCloud+ account. But they haven’t elaborated on that much yet.
If there was a white flag moment, that was it.
Apple has failed to make its most advanced on-device intelligence work across much of the hardware it spent the last two years selling as AI-ready. The next move now looks obvious: turn engineering failure into an upgrade cycle, then ask customers to pay again for the version of Apple Intelligence they thought they had already bought.


CLICK HERE FOR THE PART 2 FOLLOW-UP TO THIS POST-WWDC ARTICLE
Onto some financials, because to some, apparently, this was all “good news.”
This note is a quick post-WWDC note with some first thoughts about AAPL because anyone who watched the live cast doesn’t need me to repeat what Siri and AI are going to be. There were no surprises.
Here’s a quick table of “things you should know.”

The new Siri AI demo was not trivial, and it would be dishonest to pretend otherwise.
In broad shape, Apple has now moved toward the kind of context-aware, cross-device, app-integrated intelligence layer I sketched in my SenseOS concept last year: an assistant that works across personal data, apps, devices, screen state, user intent and everyday workflows rather than sitting in the corner waiting to be asked the weather.
Good. About time. But markets do not pay 35x for About time — they pay 35x for shipped, global and monetising.
The problem for AAPL is not whether the demo looked impressive because it did. But then again, it did in 2024, and the talk of what might come in 2025, sounded good. Here we are in June 2026 and we have another beta coming in July and a launch sometime later in the year.
Anyone else going “eerrrrr.. wasn’t “New Siri” due in May 2026, not October 2026?”
Also not much remarked on is that Siri will have a usage cap on it. So, prepare to open your wallets to use Siri, is what Apple is warning you. You thought it was a free upgrade after waiting for 24 months? Oh no, your life, on subscription.
There’s also nothing being offered which is particularly new, and not yet available on other platforms. It’s good yes, but not insanely great, and after this long a delay that’s very significant. I allows Apple to play catchup but it doesn’t position it ahead.
The problem is whether Apple has shown enough commercial visibility to support a stock still priced as if the AI gap is already closing cleanly. It has not.
What Apple showed was a promise with caveats:
- Developer preview now.
- Public beta in July.
- Broader rollout sometime in the autumn.
- English only.
- No China at launch. No EU at launch.
- No iOS/iPadOS launch in the EU to begin with.
- The most powerful on-device features tied to very recent hardware - iPhone 17 only.
- Google’s Gemini architecture underneath parts of the stack.
That is not a clean global platform launch but yet another Apple sleight of hand. Bought an iPhone 16 Pro Max? You got conned.
The hardware question may prove the most sensitive.
If the meaningful developer preview is effectively limited to iPhone 17-class hardware, while even the iPhone 16 Pro Max is not treated as ready for the full experience, then Apple has a serious credibility problem.
The iPhone 16 generation was sold into the Apple Intelligence story.
If the next cycle’s beta reveals that last year’s “AI-ready” hardware is not ready enough for the real thing, buyers will not need analysts to explain the issue to them. It shows how behind the team are, and what they showed is more of a slick alpha version than a compiled and efficient beta.
This has me alarmed.
Apple has already had to deal with litigation over Apple Intelligence promises and delayed delivery. That makes this second pass far more dangerous. A beta is acceptable when expectations are clean. It is much less acceptable when the previous promise already broke trust.
At 35x and 12% organic earnings growth, this is where the 20-year CAGR comfort story finally runs out of road.
Past compounding does not answer today’s valuation question.

Why rear value valuations aren’t worth the paper they’re written on
AAPL is not sitting at a 2010-style multiple waiting for the market to discover the iPhone.
It is a fully loved mega-cap, priced for competence, continuity and the next growth engine. Siri AI may become part of that engine but as of today, it is still too caveated, too regional, too hardware-selective and too beta-shaped to carry the weight being placed on it.
Yet again, Apple showed the future but has left us wondering if they can ship it, and when - and even where.
What they have not delivered, is a valuation case, and Gene Munster is going to have to go back and think again about his “AAPL re-rating” opportunity, because at the moment, that’s likEly to be downwards, not upwards. At 35x, AAPL needed to hit it out of the park. Instead they’re still in practice and team training, and there’s nothing in play yet.
Until Apple remember how to ship, I wouldn’t be surprised to see stagnation, a dip under $300 to $282 on a 30x multiple, or even a re-test of $265 on a lower multiple to 28x.
That’s not a prediction, just basic math.

My projections summer 2025 on how AAPL could have hit $400 this year if they’d bought Perplexity and turned their OS agentic in time for the IP17 launch, instead of waiting another year. Can the company remember how to ship?
This guy would have had heads rolling by now.

Instead we get Apple:
“We’re shipping! Later. In the autumn. But only in English, and not in China or the EU, but we’re shipping. I mean, we will be.”

This was another Tim Cook classic - promise the earth, deliver nothing, and announce more to come. I am not impressed with his final flourish.
Tommo:
“Tim, SHOW ME THE MONEY!”

CLICK HERE FOR THE PART 2 FOLLOW-UP TO THIS POST-WWDC ARTICLE
Tommo_UK, London, Monday, 8th June 2026
© 2026 Tommo_UK / tommo.fyi
Follow me on X:
www.x.com/tommo_uk
Connect with me on LinkedIn:
www.linkedin.com/in/tommo-uk
CONTACTING ME
💡 Reach out to me using the Confidential Drop Box form below.

CONTACT ME DIRECTLY: discreetly (and anonymously if you prefer)


